Facts D.K. Gadhi who is the Respondent in the present Appeal heired Appellant for legal service to file complaint against one person by name Kamal Sharma Under Section 138 of negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of cheque for an amount of Rs.20,000/- and Rs. 5,000/- as expenses in Metropolitan Magistrate, Tis Hazari Delhi, and the said person agreed to pay the cheque amount, but the …
FACTS OF THE CASE The Punjabi government implemented in 1975 that it intended to divide the 25% reservation for Scheduled Castes (SC) into two distinct classes. Balmikis (Valmikis) and Mazhabi Sikhs were to be given half of the seats set put aside for the SC category. The remaining groups in the SC category occupied the other half of the reserved seats. Before a similar law in Andhra Prad…
FACTS: The present Appeal is arisen from denial of Bail in the High Court of Jharkhand (Ranchi), where a FIR was filed against the appellant under Section 302,120- B/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 25(1-B) A of Arms Act, 1959 Read with Section 26, 27 and 35 which was filed by the Sukhdeonagar police station Case No. 238/2022 and the case was filed in High Court seeking Bail under…